California DMV retracts alert on ride-for-hire commercial registration

25 Jan 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

California DMV changes course, reverses registration policy change for rideshare drivers.

Backtracking from an announcement that had riled rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft, as well as state lawmakers, the California Department of Motor Vehicles on Saturday retracted an alert saying anyone who transports people for money must commercially register their vehicles. “We jumped the gun, and we shouldn’t have,” DMV director Jean Shiomoto said in an emailed statement. “The matter requires further review and analysis, which the department is undertaking immediately.” The early January notice posed an existential threat to businesses like Uber, Lyft and Sidecar.Earlier this month, some UberX drivers in Calfornia found themselves between a rock and a hard place: The state started requiring ridesharing service drivers to register their cars as commercial vehicles, but Uber in turn suspended some drivers who did just that.California has retracted a notice that said private drivers for ride-sharing companies such as Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. must have a commercial license plate or risk getting a citation.

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) — Uber has allegedly been under fire for suspending some of its drivers after complying with advice from California officials. Those companies allow nonprofessionals to drive customers for money, and they rest on the premise that anyone can make extra money off their personal vehicle.

Republican and Democratic lawmakers accused the DMV of applying an antiquated rule to a business model that could hardly have been anticipated when the relevant statute was written in 1935. According to the report, DMV officials “will meet with regulators and the industry to work through the issue,” presumably to develop a policy that all sides can agree to. We suspect these Uber contractors’ driving privileges will be restored fairly quickly, however; though Uber isn’t saying a lot about the issue, the company sent a statement over to Gizmodo suggesting that this deactivation shouldn’t have happened. “How a driver registers his/her vehicle is up to that driver.

Jean Shiomoto, director of the DMV in Sacramento, said in a Jan. 23 statement that the agency is rescinding the alert because of uncertainty about how the law relates to more recent regulations affecting ride-share operators. Some analysts had predicted the business implications, including requirements like commercial insurance, could be a game-changer for the embattled rideshare industry. But according to BuzzFeed, UberX drivers who complied with the DMV’s policy found themselves running afoul of Uber’s own policies, which state that UberX drivers need to have a non-commercial auto registration.

Uber does not require a driver to register his/her vehicle as personal, and it is not our policy to deactivate a driver for registering his/her vehicle as commercial,” said statement reads. “We are showing your vehicle registration is actually a commercial vehicle registration. Uber, in a statement yesterday (Jan 23), said California’s Public Utilities Commission has ruled that only a personal registration is needed and that a law signed by Governor Jerry Brown last year affirmed that decision. This gets tricky in instances where drivers are purchasing new cars, sometimes using Uber financing to do so, where they’re still being told by the company that personal is the way to go and that they should be getting personal insurance. Jerry Brown a bill that required more robust insurance requirements on drivers working for “transportation network companies.” That law acknowledged the legality of such transactions, industry representatives said. If Uber drivers are required to obtain commercial auto insurance, it could increase costs, because that coverage is more expensive than the personal insurance many ride-share drivers now carry.

But Uber said their drivers are allowed to use personal plates adding that the DMV has yet to recognize new legislation passed by Governor Brown which would authorize this. Representatives of the rideshare groups told The Times on Friday that they didn’t believe commercial plates should be required for part-time and occasional ridesharing drivers. So why, then, are Uber drivers even switching from personal to commercial vehicle registration—especially since it costs more, and typically requires much pricier commercial insurance for the vehicle itself? Under the law, ride-share companies operating in the state must provide at least US$200,000 (S$268,920) of insurance when a driver is on duty and US$1 million of coverage when the driver has picked up a customer.

However, there remains uncertainty about the interaction and effect of this law governing vehicle registration requirements with the more recent regulatory and statutory changes affecting ride share operators.

Here you can write a commentary on the recording "California DMV retracts alert on ride-for-hire commercial registration".

* Required fields
All the reviews are moderated.
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

ICQ: 423360519

About this site